Let i=(1,2,1). Check that T1T2F1=F2 using the defining relations of Uq(sl3) as in Tingley.
Fix w0=s1s2s1 in W=S3 and use W-invariance of the bilinear form on the dual of the Cartan subalgebra t of sl3 to check that ⟨α1,w0ω2∨⟩=−1. Here αi denotes a simple root and ωi∨ denotes its coroot.
Let P=Hom(T,C×) and P∨=Hom(C×,T) where T≤G denotes the subgroup of diagonal matrices. Describe P,P∨ in each case below, and state any generalizations you foresee. All homs are algebraic homs, and you may use as definition that Hom(C×,C×)=Hom(C[z,z−1],C[z,z−1])={z↦zn:n∈Z}. In particular, an algebraic hom is determined by its derivative at the identity (1∈C×). This allows us to identify P in t∗=(TeT)∗=Hom(TeT,C)=TeHom(T,C×) for example.
G=GL2
G=GL3
G=PGL2 where PGLn+1:=(GLn+1∖{0})/C× with λ∈C× acting on g∈GLn+1 by scaling.
G=PGL3
G=SL2 where SLn+1:={g∈GLn+1:detg=1}
G=SL3
For each of the above, describe the root basis (resp. coroot basis) of P (resp. P∨) in t∗ (resp. t). (Start by recalling the definitions-how are co/roots defined?)
Repeat the last question, with "root" replaced by "weight". (Start by recalling the definitions-how are co/weights defined?)
Let Γ={wωi∨:w∈W,i∈I}. Recall that a BZ datumM=(Mγ)Γ of weight (λ,μ) is a Γ-tuple of integers satisfying (i) the edge inequalities, (ii) the tropical Plucker relations, and (iii) ⟨w0ωi∨,λ⟩=Mw0ωi∨ and ⟨ωi∨,μ⟩=Mωi∨ for all i∈I. The associated MV polytopeP(M)={ν∈t∗:⟨ν,γ⟩≥Mγ} is a convex polytope (with lowest weight μ and highest weight λ). Given w∈W, let μw∈P be such that ⟨μw,wωi∨⟩=Mwωi. Show that P(M) is the convex hull of {μw:w∈W}.
Let G=SL3.
Find the possible P(M) when M is a BZ datum of weight (α1,0).
Find the possible P(M) when M is a BZ datum of weight (α1+α2,α1).
Describe the possible P(M) for a general BZ datum M.
Prove that y↦[w0yT]+ is a birational automorphism of U with inverse x↦w0−1[xw0−1]+Tw0.
Let Q be the quiver with just one vertex 1 and arrows a,b. Set A=CQ/J where J is the ideal generated by {ab,ba}. Describe the modules Vik defined in class for i=(i4,…,i1)=(1,1,1,1). See section 3.4 of Generic bases for cluster algebras and the chamber ansatz by Geiss, Leclerc, Schroer for a reminder.